Adolescent Wonderland by Naomi Hobson (Horniman Museum)

14.06.2024

https://www.horniman.ac.uk/event/adolescent-wonderland

Honestly, going to Adolescent Wonderland in the Horniman museum was one of the most wonderful experiences that I have ever had in museums and art galleries. Everything that I find in museums was there: inspiration, community, culture, knowledge, stimulation, enjoyment. A new world to discover.

My love of the museum came to me late in life. We did not go as children. Our culture was Hindi movies and songs and family visits. And the other preoccupation which took up all the time was reading. It was only when I was a mature student that I would go into the free museums around London and be surrounded by learning, culture and knowledge that I grew to love them. Other cultures. Other worlds apart from my own. Travel back into time and prehistory. The concrete things of the cultures and worlds that I had read about in books: the picture and reality to the stories.

What we got with the visit to Adolescent Wonderland was the artist herself, Naomi, accompanied by her husband. And they gave us a personal tour of the artworks. It was an enthralling expedition into the life of her community.

In the photographs, Naomi had worked with the young people of the First Nations to present them as the future and to tell their own stories. She wanted to do something different from the anthropological studies of the people through a white lens where they were presented as being part of prehistory rather than the present and the future. This was photography that was documenting the reality of the community and its young people rather than a series of stereotypes.

Someone with a camera. An artist. That was trying to change the world. For her community. To give them recognition. To allow them to express themselves. To give them a voice and an identity. Someone that was trying to change the world for the community.

Here are some of my favourite photographs from the collection with some personal comments:

‘The Good Sister’

Two kids, sitting on a bicycle. The older girl is snapping herself and her sibling with a smartphone. Behind her, her little sister stands on the bike in a rabbit mask with a cape. She is holding her fingers in the ‘V’ sign for victory.

This image is definitely cute and charming. But it is also more than that. Because this moment from the life, this casual happening in the day, becomes elevated into the mission of the photography exhibit. It is the good sister that is Naomi photographing herself and the younger generation so that they have recognition in this world. So they form part of modernity.

It is not the surroundings that are important. They are in black and white – because they show the emergence of the people from the past. And just like all the kids nowadays, these kids have their bicycles, their fancy dress and their smartphones. They are part of the digital community wherever they are. They are a part of modernity – no different from anyone else.

The sense of connection that is in this photograph is what is its biggest appeal. That sisterly love. That work on the project of photography to represent the self – not the isolated self of the Western world. The sense of self that is the community sense of self. For us and by us.

And, then there is the ‘V’ sign for Victory – this is a fight for representation. The dream of triumph for the community.

‘Daley’s Bike’

This photograph of Kayla posing next to a bike she borrowed is a stunning photograph from her furry pink coat to the beauty of design in the bicycle, to the gorgeous striped trousers that Kayla is wearing. She stands nonchalantly, looking away.

What I liked about this photograph was that it is real diversity and inclusion. The Western fashion world and the Western Media pretend that they are diverse and inclusive. They are not. This is someone that is real posing confidently like a fashion model. And she is real. She is not photoshopped. She hasn’t had someone telling her what to wear or do. She is real. And that is what is beautiful about this photograph. It is her vision of who she is through her clothes. It is her taste. It is her pose. It is how she wants to look. She is not copying anyone. It is a photograph of authenticity and diversity. The beauty of diversity. A taste of what that could look like without the endless, tireless peddling of the same within Western ‘culture’ and ‘taste’.

The colours in the striped trousers match the colours of the wheels of the bike: the body is movement, revolution.

‘OMG’

A young woman is struggling under the weight of a massive pink flamingo float which she is taking to Coen river barefoot. Her eyes are closed. The head of the flamingo is facing her and is above her head. She is draped in a towel.

The body of the woman and the massive pink float make a new body. It is almost a merging of the human with not only the animal in the bird representation, but also plastic, the wonder substance of modernity. Perhaps it is a merging of the human body with the system of the sign, the stuff of representation. And representation is heavy.

The woman is struggling under the heaviness of representation and the modern symbolic system, but she still carries on barefoot. It is a striking image of resilience, the strength of the people and its young. Their adaptability and appropriation of the world outside and their use of it in their own communities even given the iniquities of history and what that symbolic system did to them and the people.

‘Mr Cat Lover’

A man stands in a window frame with a cat. He is at the open window to the right. On his left is a closed window with a reflection of the outside world.

Naomi explained what she wanted to do with this photograph. She wanted to show that these are ordinary people like everywhere else in the world. People with affections and love for the animals. Nice people. People with humanity and emotions.

But I believe there is something else here. With the closed, reflected window to the left, we get an implicit comparison with what is happening with the cat in the open window. The closed window mirrors a humanless world with an empty car outside. The external world. It is inside the open window that there is life and the love of life, humans and humanity.

The essence of the image is when the figure with the cat comes out of the open window into the humanless world to make connections with the viewer in that world. The viewer that he has never had intercourse with. The unknown world of other people. Because, in a sense, they who are unknown are not there. Because to be human is to communicate somehow, anyhow. To communicate love above all. And so, he comes into the window and he moves towards us that do not know him to form a knowledge of knowing between us. A beautiful photograph of a beautiful thought.

Suneel’s Notes on the King Charles Portrait by Jonathan Yeo

(PhD in Visual Culture and the Law, Currently 2nd Year Art History Degree with the Open University)

Jai Maa Kaali! Inquilaab Zindabaad! Inquilaab Sada Zindabaad!

(Hail the Dark Mother! Long Live the Revolution! May the Revolution Live Forever!)

(All info gained and discussed here given in the hyperlink below)

Charles suggested the butterfly symbol as identification for the future.

– The butterfly stands for ‘metamorphosis’. When we are seeing the portrait of a King in the outdated, undemocratic monarchy and the reiteration of the same conservative politics, ethics and being. A first born in a patriarchal culture.

– The butterfly is supposed to be oneness with nature – ostensibly to support Charles’s nature work. Is it the red monarch butterfly? If so, the suggestion is that monarchy is natural and unquestionable. When it is a social construct and decidedly unnatural to have someone rule over you. The shared redness of the colours – the royal colour – suggests Charles’s oneness with royalty in nature.

– The butterfly’s transformation is perhaps also implicitly being linked to the transformation of society as we become one with nature. He is being idealised as a hero for the movement for environmentalism and sustainability – but do we have massive amounts of money like he has so that we can be heroes like him? No. It is a false celebration.

– The butterfly is ideology.

– And yet, the interview, Charles says the butterfly is how he will be identified by ‘children’ – the imagined viewer is the child that is gullible enough to swallow this ideology.

– The blackness in the butterfly – which stands out as a deliberate contrast to the overall scheme of red – is ironic given the accusations of racism made against the old guard in the royal family with the issue of Megan and Harry – as though he is being reconciled with blackness. Or it has chosen him and his shoulder for a perch to rest on. This seems like ideology again: a soothing fiction for the public.

– Red is warm. Suggestion that Charles is warm-hearted.

– Hands on the sword – suggestion of Charles as masculine strength and power – pretty ridiculous. Even the portrait artist has to hide it at the bottom of the portrait outside of the focus because it is preposterous to think of him like that. The sword image diminishes the touch of gentleness and warmth from the butterfly landing on his shoulder as though he is a Disney Princess at one with nature. It shows the reality of the ideology – that Charles represents the coercive force of Conservatism, Patriarchy and its rule of (unjust) ‘legitimate’ force in our society.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/news/king-charles-portrait-butterfly-symbol-royal-art-b2545308.html

Exhibition: The Time is Always Now – Artists Reframe the Black Figure (Some Notes)

National Portrait Gallery

02.05.2024

https://www.npg.org.uk/whatson/exhibitions/2024/the-time-is-always-now

Summary: Artwork from the African Diaspora. The website says:

”As well as surveying the presence of the Black figure in Western art history, we examine its absence – and the story of representation told through these works, as well as the social, psychological and cultural contexts in which they were produced”.

Notes:

– The title ‘The Time is Always Now’ comes from James Baldwin in the 1960s writing about the civil rights struggle.

My comment: So the aim of the exhibition is to combat racism and this is what it should be judged on – if it is giving dignity, equality and positivity to the black figure. Is it?

Overall impressions:

Goes through quite a lot of the current thinking about racism like ‘double consciousness’ when non-white people have to look at themselves through a white perspective as well as their own non-white perspective, etc. Educational for people that haven’t experienced racism and don’t really understand what it is like.

The art is presented as educational and as being completely resistant to racism. Can art be unambiguous and not contradictory like that? How easy is it to escape racism and to be free in terms of artistic vision and in your expression?

And how beautiful are the artworks? Were they captivating? Art does not have to be apolitical to be beautiful. But I wonder whether there were any pieces of great beauty in this exhibition.

Some Works Which Caught My Attention

As Sounds Turn to Noise (bronze sculpture)

Thomas J Price

https://www.galleriesnow.net/artwork/as-sounds-turn-to-noise

The artist says this is a composited fictional character ‘which really looks at the value systems contained within portraiture and monuments’. He was supposed to be giving power and grandeur to ‘fictional everyday people’, the under-represented black people excluded from art history and classical sculpture.

My Comment: Why closed eyes? The artist says she is embracing ‘the inner world that she’s manifesting there and trying to bring clarity perhaps, to all this noise around us’.

I wrote a book about the valuation of symbolic blindness in imperialistic, racist and misogynistic Victorian Britain. When blindness stood for power. Are the eyes closed because of this association from the past? Devaluation of sight in this system of valuation as in Western culture – when for Indians it is the queen of the senses and the motor of revolution.

The statue stands right at the front of an exhibition where we are looking – a guide to how we are supposed to see the rest of the exhibition?

Composited photographs from Victorian Britain by Galton were used to isolate supposed ‘racial features’ – how distanced is this sculpture from that process of racism and essentialisation when we are talking about race and the black figure reframed?

Ivan (painting)

Jennifer Packer

https://www.studiomuseum.org/artworks/ivan

My favourite painting in the whole exhibition. This is an intimate portrait of one of the artist’s friends and family. It is about a ‘human relationship’, not a person.

The face is caught in a mood of introspection. A thinking man. A reflection on thought and on the minds that give us our personality, that create our relationships with others. The restricted palette of pink is beautiful: textured, cloudlike, dreamy. Details make up the piece, there are no flat colours, many many colours. Complication. Nuance in technique. The enigmatic meaning of the feet – one clothed foot, one bare. The play between the spectacle of the body and the covering of the clothes, the ‘outer’ and the ‘inner’. A drip of paint falls from the black figure as it escapes into liquid from form. There is an air of insubstantiality, dissolution, as though everything is melting away.

The thoughts of this thinking man are what are highlighted by the artist in the personal relationship. So is she connected to him because he thinks? And what is the emotion here about that connection and his thinking? It is a mysterious image, a puzzle. Maybe her thoughts about him are unresolved, oscillating between definite form and the cloudiness that informs the image. An ambigious, contradictory and paradoxical image.

Seeing through Time

Titus Kaphar

A painting I found very beautiful too.

This is supposed to ‘dismantle’ an exclusionary Western visual representation and to subvert it. The artist is replacing the white female figures from neoclassical style paintings with black women. The artist deconstructs the western representation and removes it from the picture through cutting, etc. Then, he inserts the black figure – inclusion.

In this painting, the black serving figure for the white woman then serves the black woman instead, so the racial power disappears from the image.

The white figure disappears and becomes a black face. However, there is a sophisticated point to this image: the white figure is still providing the frame for the black face. Blackness is still being seen through the frame of whiteness. If you look carefully, one of the eyes is cut off by the outlines of the white figure that has been cut out. The black eye is limited by the white outlines that have been given to us from history. There is a tired self-awareness in this image.

The black face inside the white frame looks sad. Her own body is missing – the black body. Even her hair – with all of its power and symbolism – is not being presented. We are seeing the fragment of a black woman’s body – she still hasn’t achieved full representation. The image conveys the sadness of racism and the artist’s rendition of the black figure. It is still a work in progress, still unattained. The Time is Always Now…